Mandatory Interlock Orders are made by Courts when sentencing offenders in certain circumstances for drink driving offences.
When a Mandatory Interlock Order is made, a driver receives a period of disqualification from driving or obtaining a driver’s licence. The disqualification period is dependent on what type of drink driving offence the person is convicted of and whether it is a second or subsequent offence.
For offences where an Interlock Order is made, the driver must then obtain an Interlock licence and maintain that licence for a period of time. During the “Interlock Period”, the driver is able to only drive a car fitted with the Interlock device and is required to pay for the device to be installed on a vehicle and continue to pay a regular maintenance fee for the duration of the Interlock period.
Should the driver not obtain an Interlock licence, the driver remains disqualified for a period of up to 5 years unless and until the Interlock licence is obtained and maintained for the duration of the Interlock period.
An Interlock device is an electronic device that is fitted to a vehicle and linked to the vehicle’s ignition. Before starting the vehicle the driver is required to provide sample of his or her breath. The device then analyses the breath sample and should alcohol be detected, then the vehicle will not start. Even after successfully starting the vehicle, the device requires random samples to be given during the journey where again, a sample of the driver’s breath is analysed for the presence of alcohol. Further, a photo is taken of the driver every time the driver provides a sample. The device logs and stores the information and it is therefore designed to ensure that drivers are not able to “cheat” the device by having a passenger provide the necessary breath sample, when prompted.
An Interlock order must be made where a driver has committed any high range drink driving offence (whether a first offence or otherwise) and any other drink driving offence that is considered a second or subsequent offence. The below table shows some of the offences for which an Interlock Order is made along with the disqualification periods and minimum Interlock periods. It must be remembered that a Court has the discretion to increase the Interlock period beyond the minimum.
Offences |
Disqualification |
Minimum Interlock Period
|
|
Automatic |
Maximum |
||
2nd Low Range, Novice Range or Special Range |
1 month |
3 months |
12 months |
1st Mid Range or Drive Under the Influence |
3 months |
6 months |
12 months |
2nd Mid Range |
6 months |
9 months |
24 months |
1st High Range, Drove Under the Influence or Refuse Breath Analysis |
6 months |
9 months |
24 months |
2nd High Range, Drive Under the Influence or Refuse Breath Analysis |
9 months |
12 months |
48 months |
At the time of sentencing, the starting position is that the Interlock Order is mandatory and therefore, must be made. However, if the offender can satisfy the Court that essentially, the offender does not own or have access to a vehicle, or the offender, due to a medical condition, will be unable to comply with the Interlock requirements, then the Court is to make an Interlock Exemption Order. If an exemption order is made, then the offender is then to be dealt with differently, where longer minimum disqualification periods are imposed and no Interlock order is made.
The above is an outline of how and when Mandatory Interlock orders are made and the effect thereof. You can find more information on the Mandatory Interlock scheme at the Roads and Maritime (RMS) website.
If you have been charged with a drink driving offence and require legal assistance, then we invite you to contact one of our experts at your nearest Prime Lawyers office.
Our offices are located at our Sydney, Parramatta, Chatswood, Sutherland and Wollongong offices.
Share on
Great communication and a friendly team of staff. We will definitely recommend Prime Lawyers to friends and family.
My family and I were very impressed with the knowledge and skills that Prime Lawyers demonstrated. We were pleased with the outcome as it was better than we hoped for. We will be forever grateful for your services.
I found my experience with Prime Lawyers most satisfactory. Always received prompt reply to any query and most pleasant to deal with.