• Areas of Law
    • Business Law
      • Building & Construction Law
      • Business & Commercial Leases
      • Buying or Selling a Business
      • Franchise
      • Other Business Agreements and Advice
    • Property & Conveyancing
      • Conveyancing – Buying a Property
      • Conveyancing – Selling a Property
    • Criminal Law
      • Assault Offences
      • Apprehended Violence Orders (AVO)
      • Affray and Riot
      • Drug Offences
      • Sexual Offences
      • Firearms & Weapons Offences
    • Debt Recovery & Litigation
      • Bankruptcy
      • Corporate Insolvency
      • Litigation & Commercial Disputes
      • Mercantile and Debt Collection Agencies
      • Small Claims Debt Recovery
    • Family Law
      • Child Custody
      • Property Settlement
      • De Facto Relationships
      • Divorce
      • Family Violence & AVOs
    • Traffic Law
      • Drink Driving
      • Drug Driving
      • Licence Appeals and Habitual Offender Declarations
      • Unlicensed Driving
      • Negligent, Reckless & Dangerous Driving
    • Wills & Estates
      • Defending or Contesting a Will
      • Guardianship
      • Power of Attorney
      • Probate
      • Wills
  • Results
  • Our People
  • Knowledge Centre
  • Join Prime
  • Locations
  • About us
  • Areas of Law
    • Business Law
    • Property & Conveyancing
    • Criminal Law
    • Debt Recovery & Litigation
    • Family Law
    • Traffic Law
    • Wills & Estates
  • Results
  • Our People
  • Knowledge Centre
  • Join Prime
  • Locations
  • About us
1800 529 529 Free Case Evaluation

Family Law

Services

  • Child Custody
  • De Facto Relationships
  • Divorce
  • Family Violence & AVOs
  • Property Settlement

Locations

  • Family Lawyers Sydney CBD
  • Family Lawyers Chatswood
  • Family Lawyers Parramatta
  • Family Lawyers Sutherland
  • Family Lawyers Wollongong
< Back to Child Custody

The Best Interests of the Child – The Child’s Views

In determining what arrangements are in the child’s best interests, the Court is to take into account “primary considerations” and “additional considerations” under the Family Law Act 1975. One of the additional considerations as set out in section 60CC of the Family Law Act is the child’s views.

In the past, the Court was required to not make any Parenting Order that would be contrary to the child’s wishes, where that child was over the age of 14 years, except in special circumstances. Over time the family law changed and the Court is now required to consider any views expressed by the child and any factors, such as the child’s maturity or level of understanding, that the Court thinks are relevant to the weight it should give to the child’s views. 

The word “wishes” was replaced by the word “views” in 2006 to recognise that a child may not necessarily want to express a “wish” about which of his or her parents the child will live with or spend time with. It was intended that the word “views” will also capture a child’s perceptions and feelings, therefore allowing consultation with the child without the child requiring to make a decision or express a wish. It was intended that references to a child’s views will not exclude the child from expressing his or her wishes. 

The new terminology is also consistent with the terminology used in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. 

The Court is likely to give less weight to the views of a younger child and more weight to the views of an older child. For example, in the case of Allen v Allen (1984) it was held that a seven year old child was not in a position to make a mature, responsible and considered assessment of the relevant factors or of the significance of the decision. However, the views of children, even as young as four to eight years, are not be ignored or disregarded. For example, in the case of In the Marriage of Joannou (1985) the trial Judge’s appeal was successfully appealed for finding that the children’s wishes were not relevant, and were therefore not required to be taken any notice of. Therefore, the Court will have regard to children’s views, but may then consider that in the particular circumstances of a case, they carry little or no weight. This is especially the case where it appears that the child’s views are the result of pressure on the child, or emotional attachment by the child, therefore shedding doubt upon the question of how far they reflect the child’s own views.

It is important to note that the child’s views is only one factor to be taken into account in determining the child’s best interests, and it is common for Courts to make Parenting Orders which are contrary to the views of children. However the Court also considers the likely consequences of making a Parenting Order that is contrary to the child’s views. For example, in the case of In the Marriage of Radford and Alpe (1985) the Judge determined that in that particular case, the children were likely to be so resentful if they were taken away from one of their parents that their relationship with the other parent would be damaged irreparably.

Whether a child’s views will be taken into account in a child custody matter is therefore determined on a case by case basis and what may be relevant in one particular matter, may not be relevant in another.

If you require assistance with a child custody dispute or obtaining parenting orders, our experts at Prime Lawyers – Family Law Division can help. Contact us to make an appointment with a family lawyer at your nearest Prime Lawyers office.

We have offices in Sydney, Parramatta, Chatswood, Sutherland and Wollongong.

Share / Print

Click to View our Testimonials

Click now to make an enquiry or get a free case evaluation.

Make Contact

  • Free Case Evaluation
  • Costs

    Type of Enquiry*

    *Required Fields

      Tell us about your legal matter so we can provide you with a no obligation quote or details of our costs to help you.

      *Required Fields

      If you would prefer to talk, call us on 1800 529 529

      • Areas of Law
        • Estates
        • Family
        • Criminal
        • Traffic
        • Property & Conveyancing
        • Debt
        • Business
      • Our People
      • Results
      • Knowledge Centre
      • Join Prime
      • Locations
      • About Us

      @PrimeLawyers This is twitter:

      • Fixed fee Divorce. Talk to us today about how we can help you streamline your Application for Divorce. https://t.co/h9vhtqk3jB3 days ago

      @PrimeLawyers

      Prime Lawyers

      Make an Enquiry

      Costs

      Free Case Evaluation